Written by: Hessen Ayubzade (Goran)
Translated by: Kardo Bokani
Mr Khanbaba Tehrani according to its autobiography is the ex-founder of the Student’s Convention in Germany, the presenter of the Persian section of Beijing Radio, the founder of the Revolutionary Organisation of Iranian Todeh, the member of the Counsel of the National Resistance of the Mujahideen Organisation and finally according to Bijen Berahmand a “political analyst”. For further information you could visit his website.
One could learn and hear much unheard stories about Mr. Khanbaba Tehrani. In the memory of always existing Dr. Qasimlu and a poem written for him we can see;
When it was its turn, the dead beach started to say;
Although I lived for a quite while,
It remained unknown, who really I was;
The lively and energetic waves sparkled and said;
I exist when I march, if I don’t I am not!
Additionally there is a story of the Mr. Ahmed Qasemi and his “trial day” which is similar to that of Mr. Khanbaba Tehrani which starts as such;
The lesson that the traditional left has not taken Mr. Khanbaba and Mr Qasemi are seeking to avoid. The story of Mr. Qasemi is a Stalinist story at the same time lawyer and sociologist and probably a “political analyst” as Mr. Khnababa Tehrani. As the result of misfortune followed by the speech of Khrushchev, don’t seek to criticise Stalin. He was expelled from the Tudeh party which was the follower of the Soviet Union and as the result of that in the same way as Mr. Tehrani was exiled to China ruled by the Mao. Mr Khanbaba talked about him and criticised him as such;
Yeah such a critique, the words are as beautiful as rainbow in a nice day of spring, this is a poem as beautiful as Urfan Sepehri’s poetries, another way toward a secure life!
But today Mr. Khanbaba’s critique of his ex-comrades, the critique of the left and the morals of the comrades is associated and is emanating from the authors. This time the critique is emerged and evaluated as an intelligible reality. It entails the old despotic Stalinism; cooperation with the intelligence agencies, handcuffing Mr. Haci Ahmedi, cooperation with the Iranian delinquent regime; reminiscent of the abduction of the Kurdish political philosopher and the founder of the Kurdistan Worker Party and his surrender to the perpetrators of the Armenian’s genocide. This is impudent to the German juridical system, to justice seeking judgements of conscious people, the theories of Dr. Nuledke, Kelmet, Alban Shpingel (the judges of the Mikonos Court), silencing the voices of the Dr. Shili the lawyer of the brother of the Dr. Sherefkendi in the court room where the delinquent charged with the assassination of the general secretary of the Kurdistan Democratic Party.
The accusations that Mr. Khanaba directing toward the leader of the Free Life Party of Kurdistan (PJAK) under the heading of the ‘event analysis of the his arrest’, in fact provide legitimation for the massacre of the Kurds in Vien, Germany, thousands of assassination cases in the Southern Kurdistan, the assassination of Ali Kashifpur in Turkey as well as those cases where the people were massacred as the result of their resistance to Rafsenjani’s purge in Kurdistan.
M. Khanbab who provides the analysis of the arrest of Haci Ahmedi few hours after his arrest, is not the one who renounces the Stalinist behaviours of the Ahmed Qasmi, but in fact he is the Stalin who dose not recognise any one expect the Stalin himself. From his perspective the others are deemed to annihilation. The liberation and the due respects to the human kinds are no longer looming behind his horizon. Now he is fanatic pan-Iranian, he is totalitarian and a duplicitous fabricator. Let’s look at his interview where he give his “analysis”.
Mr. Khanbaba launches a range of fraudulous accusations against the old comrade of Dr. Qasemlu, the founder of the resistance cells in the Northern Kurdistan Mr. Adulraham Haci Ahmedi. He seek to align some defeated people with his fraudulous argument in order to surrender the leader of an organisation which has organised our energetic youths in the occupied Kurdistan in the hand of the delinquent Iranian regime. The Free Life Party of Kurdistan (PJAK) is not like the Kurdish classical movements who could be cheated under the name of brotherhood. In order for their groundless fabrication, the totalitarians and the Chauvinists labelled the leader of the PJAK as terrorist; in the same way as the members of the NATO and the other supporters of the occupying powers of Kurdistan labelled Ocalan, Arafat and Mandela as terrorist.
By labelling the PJAK and its leader as the terrorist, Mr. Khanbaba is carrying out the same mission that Ahmedinejad, the Military Corps are carrying out against our people.
In the statement made against the PJAK and its leader Mr. Khanbaba is claiming that;
1. The PJAK is violent and coercive organisation.
2. The PJAK is various criminal records.
3. It engages in military activities.
4. The leader of the PJAK has numbers of records and lives in Colon. He has private prosecutors and the files are running now.
5. The PJAK is sponsored by the Western Intelligence Forces. Bijen Berhmandi put these words into the mouth of Mr. Khnabab and now he is repeating them.
6. The PJAK is a terrorist organisation which seeks to achieve its goals through the use of violence.
7. The Iranian regime with its scandalous approaches thwarted his arrest.
The response to these fraudulous ascertains and accusations is the not what the author of this article is aiming for. Because the author of this article has organisational and ideological commitment to that movement and he is not the lawyer of the organisation. If Mr. Khanbaba was fabricating his groundless accusation in the name is “analysis” or if he was giving any evidences for his arguments, I was not going to write this article. Nonetheless he as the “political analyst” is expected to bring all his evidences, the numbers of the criminal records as he claimed that are currently on the file against Haci Ahmedi. Mr. Khnababa is well aware that there is Brant principle. Unless the charges against the Haci Ahmedi were dropped he is innocent. If Mr. Khanbaba fails to provide evidences for his baseless accusations he will be accused of launching malicious accusations, deception, baseless fabrication and the falsifications.
According to the autobiography of Mr. Khanbaba he has been living in Germany for decades. He received high education in this country. He has taught his friends and his supporters all sorts of secrecy principles as well as the technique of avoiding the secret regimes. He is well aware that the European countries have co-operations among one another and they do share intelligence among themselves; they have the addresses of all the European citizens hence there was no need to reveal the address of the leader of PJAK to the public as well as the Iranian delinquent agents. Mr. Khanbaba is well aware that no one is allowed to reveal people’s secrecy.
Probably Mr. Khanbaba is well aware of the limits on the encroachment of people’s lives. In order to prove his allegations against the leader of PJAK there was a need only for a judicial session to investigate the allegations. This is surprising that the German government was not bothered with the violation of its own laws by the “terrorist” groups. Mikonos case should not be overlooked by Mr. Khnababa. It is well evident that such analysis denotes the weakness of his ideological foundations and the collapse of the human values which heralds the re-emergence of the expired Stalinist’s moral views, which the master had no analysis of it. All the accusation of Mr. Khanbaba against the PJAK and its leader is violating the legal principle of the German ad the other European laws. Germany has the most humanist constitution in which the respecting of the humans are of the vey basic and fundamental duty of the judges. The Mikonos case revealed the fact that the independence of the German Judiciary and its commitments to the human values can be superseded by the economic interests.
The German nation and its government showed that the desires of the security forces can’t be imposed on the will of the judges. Without a doubt Mr. Tehrani is well aware of these facts. It could be said that the blind prejudice has rendered Mr. Tehrani to come to that biased conclusion. Opposition to the demands of equal rights in political, cultural and economic spheres for the Kurdish nation is the motive behind such baseless accusations. If this was not the case he would have brought his evidences. Mr. Tehrani is the old politician but un-successful one. In the same way as his friends; they were known for some times but they are all then fallen asleep. He is one of those biased-desire driven people who never felt the pains the Iranian nations went through. They were all happy with seeing the oppressed nation being eliminated; they all spurred the oppressors to carry out their acts. This is not really known as to why Mr. Tehrani did not publish any news before the fabrication of all the allegations against the leader of PJAK. Mr. Bijen Berehman published the analysis of the “master” with another article in the news site of French Radio.
What could be expected by such a master? Why he should take such hostility toward an oppressed nation who has given lots of victims toward freedom. For Mr. Tehrani the occupation of Kurdistan, the looting, plunder and the assimilation of its people is not enough. What was Haci Ahmedi’ crime? Based on what sort of legal principles they raided his house and revealed his address to the public? Mr. Khanbaba is blaming on the Iranian authorities for making the mess and not allowing the German and the other European government to hand over the leader of PJAK into the hands of the Iranian delinquent regime in the same way they handed over Abdullah Ocalan to the perpetrators of the genocides against Armenians.
Mr. Tehrani labelled the leader of PJAK as a terrorist. From the fierceness of his hatred to the PJAK he pronounced the name of the party wrongly. What is the reason for this groundless accusation? Hope that our master has a clear definition of terror. There are more than 100 different definitions of it in the counties some of which the master follow. The international lawyers have not agreed upon a singular definition. Each state and government according to its interests has certain view about that. The master in his analysis has not seen any one more vulnerable than the Kurds. This is the enemy in the disguise of friend; friendship with Qasemlu and enmity with the old comrade of Qasemlu, who works to achieve his dreams.