International Workers’ Day in Rojhelat (Iranian Kurdistan) has, over the past decades, become one of the most persistent forms of collective worker action.
This tradition has continued despite political changes, war, and strict security restrictions, and has become part of the historical memory of society in this region.
Historically, one of the earliest turning points was the May Day protests of 1946 in Kermanshah, when a workers’ gathering was violently suppressed by police, leaving several dead and injured. This event is considered one of the first signs of modern labor organization in Iran.
After the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the relatively open political atmosphere in the early years made it possible to hold larger May Day events in cities such as Sanandaj (Sine) and Mahabad. However, with the start of the Iran–Iraq War, security restrictions increased, and independent labor activities faced growing pressure.
In this context, the 1980s—especially in Sanandaj—became a key period. May Day gatherings between 1987 and 1989, including events held in places like Ezati Passage and Takhti Hall, showed a high level of organization and class awareness, even under heavy repression.
From a historical perspective, leftist movements also played an important role. For example, Komala in the 1980s was one of the influential left-wing groups in Kurdistan. It helped shape a political and social environment where workers’ demands and events like May Day could be expressed. Its influence was mainly seen in political ideas, social organization, and the spread of justice-oriented discourse. In later years, groups such as PJAK also contributed to discussions around social justice and participation.
In addition, Kurdish political parties in Iran still regularly issue statements on May Day. For instance:
- Komala (factions) focuses on workers’ rights, unionization, and criticism of capitalism
- PJAK highlights social justice, democracy, and the role of women
These statements can be seen as part of the political and media activities of these groups, helping to keep May Day visible despite internal restrictions.
Overall, analysts believe that the continuity of May Day traditions in Rojhelat comes from a combination of factors: informal worker networks, the transfer of experience between generations, and the influence of leftist and justice-based ideas. In this sense, May Day is not just symbolic—it serves as a platform for expressing workers’ demands and strengthening social solidarity.
Despite ongoing restrictions, reports suggest that workers in these regions continue to mark the day in different ways—from small gatherings to symbolic activities.
As a result, May Day remains a lasting expression of collective worker action in the social memory of Rojhelat.